Teams in mid-life crisis, or, How to use psychology to help your team meet deadlines [#4 in a series on teams]

With guest bloggers Lachlan Heasman and Anton du Toit.

In the previous post we wrote about how a team’s working methods tend to get set implicitly at the start of a project. Connie Gersick found something else about how teams tend to work across their lifespan, though.

When the project is around its halfway point, teams are likely to re-evaluate their working methods in an effort to achieve their goals in the time remaining. This is more likely if they are receiving information from outside the team, especially around how they are performing. They learn from the first half of the project, and will talk explicitly about how to approach the work. Gersick found that teams that are performing well can just check in and keep doing what they are doing. Teams that were not performing well may have a meeting around the halfway mark, review how they are going and persist with their less than optimal approaches to work: positive changes are possible, but they are not guaranteed to just happen naturally.

lachpucThis time is an excellent opportunity to learn and shift behaviour. There can be a naturally occurring reflection process that happens around the halfway point to a deadline, so use that opportunity to make some positive changes. Teams may change their work practices for the second half of their project in an attempt to meet the deadline.

How to use your team’s midlife crisis as an opportunity
First of all, be aware where the halfway point of the project is, and use the opportunity. You might call a halftime review meeting. Frame the meeting as such – you’re halfway through, it’s a time to think about what you’ve done, what has and hasn’t worked, and using that knowledge to make conscious decisions about how you will approach work in the second half.

Second, break up projects into smaller, discrete units, with shorter timescales. Having more halfway points creates more opportunities for the naturally occurring re-evaluation of performance. It also allows the team to develop the skill of reflecting on how they work, and to accumulate more shared knowledge, through having been through this process more often.

It helps if these smaller units are meaningful, discrete units, rather than arbitrary milestones. If you’re using Scrum, each sprint creates a ready made deadline for the team. Pay attention to the conversations in the team around the middle of the sprint. Is there any talk about how little time is left in the sprint and how much work there is to do? If there is, use the opportunity to help the team improve. If there is no discussion, maybe the team does not think the end of the sprint is a firm deadline to deliver something that is done, so that’s a different conversation you need to have.

pic 2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s